<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ratatouille deserves a Best Picture nomination, at the very least</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mouseextra.com/2007/12/02/ratatouille-deserves-a-best-picture-nomination-at-the-very-least/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mouseextra.com/2007/12/02/ratatouille-deserves-a-best-picture-nomination-at-the-very-least/</link>
	<description>Feeding the Disney fixation daily</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.mouseextra.com/2007/12/02/ratatouille-deserves-a-best-picture-nomination-at-the-very-least/#comment-2144</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 22:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mouseextra.com/2007/12/02/ratatouille-deserves-a-best-picture-nomination-at-the-very-least/#comment-2144</guid>
		<description>I would like to see Ratatouille be nominated for best picture, but I doubt it would win. The Academy will never let an animated film win that category.

The writer of the article also got one of his facts wrong. He said a G-rated film has never been considered for best picture, but Beauty and the Beast was nominated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see Ratatouille be nominated for best picture, but I doubt it would win. The Academy will never let an animated film win that category.</p>
<p>The writer of the article also got one of his facts wrong. He said a G-rated film has never been considered for best picture, but Beauty and the Beast was nominated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
